Writers wanted - Previous experience not necessary, you only need an interest and we can help every step of the way. Please PM qubit or alexp999 for details.

Jump to content

Welcome to techngaming.com
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. This message will be removed once you have signed in.
Login to Account Create an Account
Photo

[News] Microsoft Confirms Windows 8 Logo. Looks Like A Retrograde Step


  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic

#1
qubit

In a blog entry by Sam Moreau on the Windows Team blog, Microsoft has revealed the new Windows 8 logo. The first thing one notices about it is how radically different it is to past logos, with a much simpler and boring look, including the single blue colour for the entire logo.

In the blog, Moreau explains the evolution of the various Windows logos. Starting right from Windows 1.0, he explains how the logo has become more sophisticated and powerful with each successive Windows release, with the pinnacle being the Vista Orb logo, which really gets over how powerful PCs have become, with its subtle colouring, shading and Aero glass effects. It really does have the 'wow' look, even today. In hindsight, it's a real shame that Vista was half-baked at launch and bombed so badly, since the attractive and sophisticated Windows look that it brought us was a real innovation and would likely have continued to this day. Comparing the look of Vista to 7, the latter arguably did away with the elegant wow look for a flatter, more boring look. Of course, what's under the bonnet works much better though, so skinning 7 with the Vista look gives you the best of both worlds. The graphic below compares the new Windows 8 logo with its predecessors, all the way back to Windows 1.0.

Posted Image


Here is the sophisticated Vista Orb logo in high resolution:

Posted Image
Which do you prefer?

With Windows 8 however, Microsoft is going for the iPad / tablet look and feel for its flagship operating system, with the Metro interface, which replaces the Start button / Windows Orb. In this mode, applications open full screen only and are single tasking, with non-foreground apps entering a suspended state. If this sounds scarily like harking back to the old says of 1980's DOS with a graphical interface bolted on, you're right and one wonders what Microsoft is thinking to make Windows work in this way. It appears to be attempting to emulate the inordinately successful Apple iPad, which works in a roughly similar way. This is why it's bad when poor products become wildly successful: competitors copy them and we all get mediocre products as a result. Thankyou Steve Jobs.

Using this application suspension system, one can imagine the scenario of listening to some music, then browsing the internet and the music stops, then going back to the music program, doing both tasks separately. Doing both at once like you can now? Impossible. How the hell is this progress?! Yes, one can switch to the current desktop for now and run standard desktop apps, but the Start menu is still missing and one must launch everything from the Metro interface, constantly switching uncomfortably between the two interfaces. If this is the direction that Microsoft wants to take Windows, then we must question just how long we will even have access to the current desktop? Windows 7 might just stick around as long as XP has…

Well, given this new direction for Windows, Microsoft wanted to create a new Windows logo to go with it. Enter famous graphic design house, Pentagram, to help them create that logo. In a meeting early in the development cycle for Windows 8, one of the members Paula Scher asked a very simple question:

"Your name is Windows. Why are you a flag?"

It's a good question. It seems to have happened in the transition from Windows 3 to Windows 98, as a sort of window/flag hybrid. Still, it looks attractive and everyone recognizes and accepts it. Well, the design teams put their heads together to create a logo to go with Metro and came up with the new simple-looking Windows 8 logo that you see above (with its single happy blue colour). We have to say that it does agree with the new Metro look and ethos: dumbed down and simplistic for the user who has no idea how to use a computer and take advantage of the power that a modern computer offers. Along with Metro, it frankly looks like a retrograde step for Microsoft to take.

Here is Moreau's take on why this new style was chosen:

"But if you look back to the origins of the logo you see that it really was meant to be a window. "Windows" really is a beautiful metaphor for computing and with the new logo we wanted to celebrate the idea of a window, in perspective. Microsoft and Windows are all about putting technology in people's hands to empower them to find their own perspectives. And that is what the new logo was meant to be. We did less of a re-design and more to return it to its original meaning and bringing Windows back to its roots – reimagining the Windows logo as just that – a window."

So, people are now 'empowered' to find their own 'perspectives', are they? Sounds like mere marketing speak, than anything useful and relevant.

We await the next public preview of Windows 8 on February 29th to see what Microsoft has done with Metro, the current desktop and Windows 8 in general.

Click here to view the article

  • _JP_ likes this

tng Poll v2: Will You Upgrade your PC to Haswell in 2013?

 

Here's a very useful video on herding cats. Practice this and you might just become as good as me!


#2
IlluminAce

That's a very bold move from the marketing team at MS, but one which slots nicely into the Metro landscape. It has an extremely modern, clean, tablet-esque feel. The window to promise and fulfillment. Tux can see right through it!

Personally, I'd rather have seen them go with the modern look, but still retain the historically iconic quad-colour scheme for the window. RGBY is firmly in the hands of Google now.

560275.gif


#3
_JP_

Functionality over looks. Always.
I still prefer office 2003 to 2007/2010, but I am forced to use 2007 because of the new extension. Meh.


#4
alexp999

I can't imagine it will be quite as bad with the multi-tasking as you've made out, or Microsoft would be crucifying the OS for work purposes.

I can't count how many programs most of my colleagues have open at once across their two screens. It just wouldnt work only being able to run two at once.

I must admit, Win 8 isnt really grabbing me atm, with Win 7, i was jumping at every beta release, but I just worry they are going for features and looks over what fundamentally makes a good OS. I just hope its not another ME/Vista all over again, but lately the trend seems to have gone good-bad-good-bad with Windows releases.

I just wish linux had more support from application and game developers. If we could get games running natively I would switch without hesitation.


#5
_JP_

I just wish linux had more support from application and game developers. If we could get games running natively I would switch without hesitation.

Same here. ^_^





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users