Writers wanted - Previous experience not necessary, you only need an interest and we can help every step of the way. Please PM qubit or alexp999 for details.

Jump to content

Welcome to techngaming.com
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. This message will be removed once you have signed in.
Login to Account Create an Account


Advertisement


Newest Downloads


Today's Wallpaper


* * * * *

Review EVGA NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Kepler Review




Click image to enlarge



Advertisement
Today we will be taking a look at the new GeForce GTX 680 graphics card, NVIDIA's latest flagship. The model we have is a reference card from EVGA, which we will be comparing to AMD's top GPU the Radeon HD 7970 and their previous offering the HD 6970. In this review we will also be performing the tests on AMD's current top end CPU and motherboard platform, which you can find more details of later on in the review.

With the arrival of the GeForce GTX 680 comes a new architecture, codenamed Kepler, which replaces the Fermi architecture of NVIDIA's two previous generations of cards, the 400 and 500 series. You can see the specifications of the new card below, alongside the other two cards we will be comparing with plus NVIDIA's previous offering the GTX 580:

Posted Image

Here is a screenshot of GPU-Z showing the properties of the card:

Posted Image

One new technology that the GTX 680 brings is called GPU Boost, this works much like the Turbo boost features on the latest Intel and AMD CPUs. A base clock is set, in the GTX 680's case this is 1006MHz, but most cards are capable of exceeding this in reasonable conditions and so the card will automatically overclock itself if it has enough headroom in terms of temperature and power draw. You can see this in the GPU-Z screenshot below, note the top line shows that during the render test, the card (and drivers) have automatically overclocked the card from the base clock of 1006 MHz, up to 1123.5 MHz. NVIDIA specify that there will be an average boost clock of 1058 MHz, to achieve this the vcore is also increased, which will increase heat output, so the card may clock back down again if it runs out of TDP (thermal design power) headroom.

Posted Image

On the next page of our review we will take a look at EVGA's product packaging!








9 Comments

Nice review. I see that the minimum frame rates are much better than the AMD card too and that's where it really counts.

I'd certainly like to have one, but I want the daddy GK110 which will be seriously faster than my GTX 580, so I'm gonna wait for that.
  • Quote
I'm waiting for GK110 as well, kind of a shame they went with the 680 name for what should be the "660 Ti" or something like that.
  • Quote
Indeed it's a 660 or 670 really, but it's marketing at work again. I do think that AMD and NVIDIA operate a semi duopoly here, where they outdo each other by just enough to win the performance crown, but without decimating the other's product and crucially, without starting a price war. This way, the punters get less and pay a lot more for the privilege. :shakehead: If those rumoured GK110 specs are anything to go by, I'll bet it would destroy a 7970. But you wait, by the time it comes out, AMD will have something to counter it with similar performance. August is quite some time away, after all.

Even though a cartel lawsuit failed a while back against AMD & NVIDIA, you can feel when companies are doing it, because there are too many coincidences one after the other and the prices stay too high for it to all be just chance.

Despite all this, the 680 in absolute terms is a great card, even if NVIDIA held its performance back somewhat and upmarketed a lower GPU. Thing is, it's only 16% faster than my 580 and that's nowhere near enough an improvement to justify another £400 upgrade. But then again...
  • Quote
I have dual GTX 470's right now and I play at 5760x1080, I have yet to feel the need to upgrade with the 680's or 7970's, hence why I'm waiting. :)
  • Quote
Amazing review man.
  • Quote
Good review Alex. Excellent photography and spreadsheet work. Would have liked to have seen some heavy AA comparisons though. This review gets extra points for being one of the rare ones benching with an AMD FX CPU.
  • Quote
Thanks damric.

As these are personal cards, the AMD ones have been moved, so I have been stuck with whatever I had tested before. I would have liked more comparisons.

With that said, I am happy to do some general performance testing on it, if anyone wants to let me know what they would like to see for the follow-up review.
  • Quote
I cant wait to see more reviews here honestly, seems another site appears to have a pretty big bias towards one company or another.
  • Quote
They're coming, fear not! :)
  • Quote
or Sign In

Please Note - To prevent spam, all comments must be approved by a moderator. Registered members should discuss this article in the Forums