Jump to content

Welcome to techngaming.com
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!

Active Topics

Advertisement

Today's Wallpaper

Steam Group

logo

techngaming.com [tng]

74 Members

Newest Downloads

Recent Blog Entries

- - - - -

Upgrade Dilemma: Ivy Bridge Benchies Leaked. Better Than SB, But Should You Upgrade?


VR-ZONE reports on some leaked bencharks posted at obr-hardware.com for the upcoming Ivy Bridge processors, specifically the Core i7-3770K, which has four HyperThreading enabled cores.

The CPU used was a C0 stepping engineering sample with a clock speed of 3.5GHz and 3.9GHz turbo boost (come on Intel, you can hit 4GHz officially!). It was plugged into a Z68 motherboard (brand/model not revealed) which had UEFI firmware to support the new CPU.

There's lots of confusing stats to get your head around in the table, but the takeaway message is that the new CPU improves on the i7-2600K by around 9% overall in single-threaded and heavily multi-threaded tests. Considering the 3% boost in clock speed (i7-2600K runs at 3.4GHz) VR-ZONE then worked out the boost in IPC, taking into account the 100MHz clock speed difference with the i7-2600K, that Ivy Bridge offers a modest 6% boost in IPC. Worth having, but not something to fall over yourself to get one about. Note that none of the benchmarks are retail games, which is the acid test for gaming enthusiasts.

Ivy Bridge is a 'tick' step design, ie a new architecture, which comes with the much improved HD 4000 graphics core and a significantly lower power consumption. With a TDP of just 77W, it's a full 18W down compared to Sandy Bridge and this is something to get excited about. Why? It'll run a lot cooler at stock speed and will fit inside the cramped case a of a laptop a lot more comfortably, as the heat will be easier to dissipate, giving better performance all round. Also, taking into account the new 22nm Tri-Gate transistors that this is made with, the CPU is expected to overclock very well indeed, perhaps even leaving Sandy Bridge in the dust (we'll have to wait for official reviews on this one). Now, this is really something for PC enthusiasts to get excited about! There will even be low power 65W parts sold, intended primarily for laptops, but will likely be available retail for enthusiasts to put in their desktops and HTPCs.

Interestingly, obr-hardware's article has been pulled, because they didn't want to get on the wrong side of Intel., but claimed that this wasn't NDA, which is odd: "Everyone already have seen it, because of good relationship with Intel, taken down ... PS. not NDA signed but ..."
Yeah, me too.

And now to that perennial question for PC enthusiasts: should you upgrade? It's assumed that our hypothetical enthusiast has a high-end graphics card to go with their fast CPU, as the two tend to go together. Well, usually. So, one could argue that if you own a 2600K/2700K, or even an older 2500K (but this has less cache and no HT) you already have a very fast and competent processor, that will play all the latest games with high frame rates and will remain viable for another couple of years or so.

This sort of reasonable argument doesn't tend to wash with enthusiasts, who quite reasonably want the performance improvements that the very latest technology brings, perhaps just because they can. Hence, funds allowing (or the credit card allowing) the answer is a resounding "YES!"

The new Ivy Bridge range will be launched alongside 7-series chipset motherboards including Z77, soon now in week one or two of April. Can't wait.


Discuss this in the Forums

10 Comments

Seems that my i7 970 will still be relavent performance wise even with how old this arch is which makes me happy, 130w ftw!
  • Quote
I'm still on my trusty i5 760. I see no need to move up from that unless i find an amazing deal.

IB-E might be interesting though. Pretty sure i saw some leaked info on that having a 10core variant ... oh my.
  • Quote
Someone buy me a watercooler and I'll be happy at 5ghz with my BD.

Although if someone were to buy me a i7 rig I'd switch over for sure. heh.
  • Quote
My Core 2 still does the job, although I am fighting the urge to upgrade on a budget. Those i5 2400s have been teasing me for a very long time now. If these prove better, I might just hold on for a bit more.
  • Quote
Any word on pricing? That'll be the make or break for me, I have a spare P67 board that's got a firmware update for it, I'd drop my 2600k in that and put in the IB one in the Z68, but it all depends on the cost.
  • Quote
A little disappointing; I was expecting more from the new architecture from the get-go.

But I suppose this is because I've migrated further away from "enthusiast" territory to "pseudo-enterprise", where 24x7 reliability, parallelism (still only 4xHT... come on...) and virtualization capabilities are key.
  • Quote
Maybe I have misunderstood you, but Ivy Bridge isn't a new architecture. And Sandy had a breakthrough in the IMC part, the rest was pretty much the same. So that I agree.
People, these days, want reliability, a safe investment.
  • Quote
So not everyone is chomping at the bit, just because it's the latest?! Nah, I'm teasin', lol.

Yes, I believe that if Bulldozer had been better, we would have seen a more advanced Ivy Bridge. IlluminAce, I guess you'll be more concerned whether it will support features such as VT-d, I guess? I don't know at this point, but I wouldn't be surprised if the non-K versions do.

I'm sorry, but I don't have any pricing info at the moment, Sinzia.
  • Quote
Got it in one q, but I don't hold out much hope. My money's on Intel crippling their K lineup once more by removing VT-d... rendering yet another excellent CPU useless to me. It's a clever move by the big 'I' though, I doff my cap to their marketing dept.

Fair point JP, but I'm not sure I completely agree. Definitely, first and foremost, we'd all call the usual suspects x86/amd64/ia64/ARM/SPARC/... "architectures" (certainly, that's what the kernel build process considers them to be - arch/foobar/boot/bzImage). However, they are really known as instruction sets, which are themselves a kind of architecture. Similarly, Bulldozer/PPC/SB/IB/Netburst are all different processor designs, another kind of architecture. Even von Neumann is a kind of architecture. It's one of those terms which is not originally a computing term, but a general term applied to many different parts of computing. If I recall correctly from my studies, IB would technically be considered a "microarchitecture"... but hey ^_^
  • Quote
Ivy Bridge is good and it will be the first baby step of Intel on 22nm node, what I'm looking forward is the awesome die shrink of SB-E, I damn hope Intel will give us a Core i7 8c/16t or better, 10c/20t.
  • Quote
or Sign In