Writers wanted - Previous experience not necessary, you only need an interest and we can help every step of the way. Please PM qubit or alexp999 for details.

Jump to content

Welcome to techngaming.com
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. This message will be removed once you have signed in.
Login to Account Create an Account


Advertisement


Newest Downloads


Today's Wallpaper


- - - - -

Editorial The Problem With Multiple Monitors


Click image to enlarge



Advertisement
Surprising number of downsides
There's a perception that the more monitors hanging off your graphics card the better and that the only thing limiting the amount of monitors are price and desktop space. Well, I have been using dual monitors of one sort or another for several years now and I can tell you that this isn't true, as they're a double edged sword.

When I first started writing tech news back in September 2011 for another site, I had just the one monitor that I used regularly, an Iiyama 26" 1920x1200 beast that happened to also be reasonable for fast FPS gaming (actually it looks pants when compared to my latest Asus 144Hz LightBoost monitor).


Attached Image: NVIDIA surround gaming.jpg
Thumbnail shows an example of NVIDIA multi monitor gaming
using four monitors. Click to enlarge.

The Iiyama is a great monitor for general desktop use and with that resolution giving a 16:10 aspect ratio really does give you a lot of screen real estate for regular desktop work, offering a great panoramic view. However, things get rather cramped when writing news stories and editorials like this one. That’s because I need to have two windows open side by side, one for the source material and one for my article editor window. This effectively halves the resolution to 960 pixels across and that’s too narrow for comfortable writing, due to a tiny editor window.

I then added a 23" LG W2363D 120Hz 1920x1080 monitor which fixed the squish problem, but introduced others. More recently, I got rid of the Iiyama in favour of the 27" Asus VG278HE 144Hz 1920x1080 monitor with NVIDIA LightBoost. The Asus is my primary monitor sitting directly in front of me which I'm writing this article on, with the LG sitting to the left and angled towards me.

Ok, so the significant benefit is having twice the screen real estate and display flexibility, but what are the downsides?

• Cost. Buying two or more monitors is expensive, especially ones offering higher than 1080 resolution
• Desk space. These take a significant amount of space on your desk. With today's trend towards bigger monitors, this is a significant issue
• Viewing angle will only be optimum for one monitor, with the user having to turn their head for the second one. This tends to discourage use of the second monitor due to this slight discomfort. If the second monitor is smaller and/or a lower spec than the main one that will also be a discouraging factor
• Power and heat issues. Two monitors obviously consume twice the power, but more importantly, they put a bigger load on the graphics card, making it work harder. Also, mainly due to driver issues, some graphics cards don’t enter low power mode properly when running more than one display which causes power and heat output to be kept at a significantly higher level. The user may not care so much about this, but they will care about the extra noise from a faster-spinning cooling fan on the graphics card and a potentially hot room. In fact, the Firefox web browser tends to trigger this with my GTX 580 regardless of the hardware acceleration setting and convincing it to throttle down can be futile, so poor me just lives with it
• The distraction of a screen positioned to the side: having something illuminated in your peripheral vision is distracting and potentially annoying
• Little things, such as the mouse pointer disappearing off the main screen when you don’t mean it to, because the desktop no longer ends at the left or right edge can be inconvenient. It can be especially annoying with the second monitor positioned to the right, since you can't just conveniently slam the mouse into the right hand corner and click the Close button. No, the pointer has to be consciously aimed and clicked instead, which takes more time and effort. A small thing for sure, but niggly with an action that's performed so often
• Discontinuous desktop. This is caused by the desktop being stretched across two physical screens, since the monitor bezels and different viewing angles can make moving windows between them a slightly disconcerting experience. The fact that the monitors are likely to show a different quality of picture doesn't help, either
• Potential issues with 3D games not working properly. However, I’ve not seen this problem personally, but have heard about it
• All that light shining in your face is absolutely terrible if you have a migraine!

There are probably more downsides I could think of, but I think that these are enough to get the general idea. Due to these things, I tend to switch off the extra monitor and configure the NVIDIA driver for single monitor use when I'm not using it for writing articles for techngaming.com, every tech enthusiast's favourite website.

So, what are your experiences of using two or more monitors? Let us know in the comments below!

I'd like to thank Alex for contributing to this article.


7 Comments

I use the 3+1 Nvidia layout, and for gaming it can be real nice... when it works. Some games do not like that ultra wide resolution.

  • Quote

It seems that to game on two monitors or more, you need more than one nvidia card in the system, which seems odd to me. All these cards are dual head at least, so why don't they support gaming with two monitors with one card, especially with a high end one, like mine?

  • Quote

680's will do 4 on one card, the 500's and lower need SLi tho.

    • qubit likes this
  • Quote

I'd take a high resolution single monitor, over multi-monitor setups anytime. I only consider multi-monitor setups useful for racing games.

    • qubit likes this
  • Quote

I'm still considering two matched monitors side by side in my next setup...

    • qubit likes this
  • Quote

Does this mean that you'll finally go over to the dark side and get a couple of 1080 monitors or will you stick to two 1050 ones?!

  • Quote

At home I run a 6-monitor configuration. My main box only powers 4, with various monitors shared between boxes, and to simplify/complicate things (depending on your perspective) there's Synergy running over all of them.

 

At work I use 4 monitors.

 

On the extremely rare occasion I fire up a game, it would be on one monitor only, since I dislike bezels getting in the way. However, for work, dev and typical usage, until they bring out an extremely high resolution 120" display, or some pretty refined glasses, I'll be using multi-monitors. I find it a much more efficient and agreeable configuration then snap-to-sides on wide.

  • Quote
or Sign In

Please Note - To prevent spam, all comments must be approved by a moderator. Registered members should discuss this article in the Forums